PhD, Management Professor, Lake Mary, FL, USA
PhD, MBA, CPA, CTP, Professor of Accounting, Grand Canyon University, Washington DC, USA
This research paper summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the transformational educational leadership and the innovative strategies engaging online faculty for the excellent teaching performance in the United States. There are various leadership traits of academic leadership to assess engagement amongst online adjunct faculty in the online platform of higher education. This research study focuses on the lived experiences of academic leaders to aid online adjunct faculty in trying to increase the sense of inclusion, engagement, and support. Applying the lived experiences of academic leader could retrieve elements within online adjunct faculty so they can have a positive contribution towards the institution. Support is needed to improve engagement, to assist adequate academic leadership. Systematization of the literary sources and approaches for solving the problem the academic leadership indicates that incorporate individualized strategies when the leader recognizes the value online adjunct faculty bring to their institutions. The relevance of this scientific problem decision is that the themes within this article breakdown the vital impact leaders have with their online adjunct faculty. The wide-ranging factors discussed in this article were categorized to demonstrate the critical components that leadership strategies if implemented effectively, could aid in an engagement component and inclusion for online adjunct faculty. Factors that are vital for academic leadership could be the use of leadership strategies to promote engagement and inclusion within the online environment outlined in this scientific article. The research paper presents the results of an empirical analysis all strategies incorporated in finding the material, history of online education, remote learning environment, leadership traits, leadership support for remote, adjunct faculty, leadership characteristic inactive online adjunct faculty engagement, leadership challenges, authentic relationship, benefits of engagement, communication obstacles on the virtual platforms, and theories within leadership presented a more in-depth understanding on the topic of online adjunct faculty engagement and inclusion. The results of the research can be useful by all academic leaders from all undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate level around the world.
Keywords: Leadership, Ethics, Innovation, Strategies, Online Teaching.
JEL Classification: C41, M14, F23, O31, P36.
Cite as: Matos, L., Kasztelnik, K. (2021). Transformational Educational Leadership and the Innovative Strategies Engaging Online Faculty for the Excellent Teaching Performance in the United States. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.5(1).6-21.2021
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- Allen, N., Grigsby, B., & Peters, M. L. (2015). Does leadership matter? Examining the relationship among transformational leadership, school climate, and student achievement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 10(2), 1-22. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083099.pdf.
- Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008.
- Anthony-McMann, P. E., Ellinger, A. D., Astakhova, M., & Halbesleben, J. R. (2017). Exploring different operationalizations of employee engagement and their relationships with workplace stress and burnout. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(2), 163-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21276.
- Barnett, D. (2017). Leadership and job satisfaction: Adjunct faculty at a for-profit university. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 4(3), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2017.03.006.
- Barnett, D.E. (2018). Online adjunct faculty: A quantitative examination of the predictive relationship between leadership and job satisfaction. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 4(1), 226-236. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383159.
- Benton, S., & Li, D. (2015). Professional development for online adjunct faculty: The chair’s role. The Department Chair, 26(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.20072.
- Billot, J., West, D., Khong, L., Skorobohacz, C., Roxå, T., Murray, S., & Gayle, B. (2013). Followership in higher education: Academic teachers and their formal leaders. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(2), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.2.91.
- Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 2004(127), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.152.
- Boekhorst, J. A. (2015). The role of authentic leadership in fostering workplace inclusion: A social information processing perspective. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21669.
- Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Hetland, J. (2012). The measurement of state work engagement. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000111.
- Calota, G., Pirvulescu, B., & Criotoru, I. (2015). The importance of the management communication process. Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 10(1), 77-83. Available at: http://www.nou.univath.ro/files/pdf/Nr_1(37)_2015.pdf#page=82.
- Caruth, G. D., & Caruth, D. L. (2013). Adjunct faculty: Who are these unsung heroes of academe? Current Issues in Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.715265.
- Crawford, T., & Germov, J. (2015). Using workforce strategy to address academic casualisation: A university of Newcastle case study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(5), 534-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1079394.
- Davis, A., Dent, E., & Wharff, D. (2015). A conceptual model of systems thinking leadership in community colleges. Systemic Practice & Action Research, 28(4), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9340-9.
- Delanoy, N., Kasztelnik, K. (2020). Business Open Big Data Analytics to Support Innovative Leadership Decision in Canada. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(2), 56-74. http://doi.org/10.21272/bel.4(1).56-74.2020.
- Dostaler, I., Robinson, M.A., & Tomberlin, T.J. (2017). A focus on engagement: Defining, measuring, and nurturing a key pillar of AACSB standards. Organization Management Journal (Routledge), 14(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2017.1293427.
- Eagan, M.K., Jaeger, A.J., & Grantham, A. (2015). Supporting the academic majority: Policies and practices related to part-time faculty’s job satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(3), 448-481. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2015.0012.
- Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T.N. (2015). Leader-member exchange theory. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 13(2). 641-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.22010-2.
- Ferencz, T.L.S. (2017). Shared perceptions of online adjunct faculty in the united states who have a high sense of community. Journal of Educators Online, 14(2), 55-73. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1150582.pdf.
- Field, S.C., Lauzon, L.L., & Meldrum, J.T. (2016). A Phenomenology of Outdoor Education Leader Experiences. Journal of Experiential Education, 39(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825915609950.
- Flynn, C.B., Smither, J.W., & Walker, A.G. (2016). Exploring the relationship between leaders’ core self-evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of servant leadership: A field study. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(3), 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815621257.
- Gardner, W.L., Cogliser, C.C., Davis, K.M., & Dickens, M.P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007.
- Gehrke, S.J., & Kezar, A. (2015). Supporting non-tenure-track faculty at 4-year colleges and universities: A national study of deans’ values and decisions. Educational Policy, 29(6), 926-960. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814531651.
- Goldman, K.D., & Schmalz, K.J. (2012). Adjunct teaching: Part-time professorial possibilities, provisions, and provisos. Health Promotion Practice, 13(3), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912442516.
- Hoch, J. E. (2014). Shared leadership, diversity, and information sharing in teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 541-564. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2012-0053.
- Holliday, T., Martin, M., & Martin, D. (2010). Community college supervisors and their subordinates: A quantitative investigation of personality temperament and leader-member exchange. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4(2), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20166.
- Jena, L.K., Pradhan, S., & Panigrahy, N.P. (2018). Pursuit of organisational trust: Role of employee engagement, psychological well-being and transformational leadership. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(3), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.11.001.
- Jolley, M.R., Cross, E., & Bryant, M. (2014). A critical challenge: The engagement and assessment of contingent, part-time adjunct faculty professors in United States community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(2-3), 218-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2014.851969.
- Kasztelnik, K. & Delany, N. (2020). Data Analytics and Social Media as the Innovative Business Decision Model with Natural Language Processing. Journal of Business and Accounting, 13(1). Available at: http://asbbs.org/files/2020/JBA_Vol_13.1_Fall_2020.pdf.
- Kasztelnik, K. (2020). Causal-Comparative Macroeconomic Behavioral Study: International Corporate Financial Transfer Pricing in the United States. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(1), 60-75. http://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.4(1).60-75.2020.
- Kasztelnik, K. (2020). Innovative Empirical Model for Predicting National Bank’s Financial Failure with Artificial Intelligence Subset Data Analysis in the United States. Open Economics, 3, 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1515/openec-2020-0106.
- Kasztelnik, K. (2015). The Value Relevance of Revenue Recognition under International Financial Reporting Standards. Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 4(3), 88-98 http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/afr.v4n3p88.
- Kasztelnik, K. Gaines, V.W. (2019). Correlational Study: Internal Auditing and Management Control Environment Innovation within Public Sector in the United States. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 3(4),5-15. http://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.3(4).5-15.2019.
- Khan, K.E., Khan, S.E., & Chaudhry, A.G. (2015). Impact of servant leadership on workplace spirituality: Moderating role of involvement culture. Pakistan Journal of Science, 67(1), 109. Available at: link.
- Lather, A.S., & Jain, V.K. (2015). Ten c’s leadership practices impacting employee engagement: A study of hotel and tourism industry. Vilakshan: The XIMB Journal of Management, 12(2), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2016.076818.
- Magda, A.J., Poulin, R., & Clinefelter, D.L. (2015). Online adjunct faculty. Available at: http://www.learninghouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Online-Adjunct-Faculty-Report-2015.pdf.
- Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003.
- Martins, D.C. (2008). Experiences of homeless people in the health care delivery system: a descriptive phenomenological study. Public Health Nursing, 25(5), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2008.00726.x.
- Nichols, A. (2016). What do people desire in their leaders? The effect of leadership experience on desired leadership traits. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(5), 658-671. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2014-0182.
- Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice(4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Available at: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962#description.
- Pearce, C.L., Wassenaar, C.L., & Manz, C.C. (2014). Is shared leadership the key to responsible leadership. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0017.
- Peterlin, J., Pearse, N. J., & Dimovski, V. (2015). Strategic decision making for organizational sustainability: The implications of servant leadership and sustainable leadership approaches. Economic & Business Review, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.15458/85451.4.
- Pons, P.E., Burnett, D.D., Williams, M. R., & Paredes, T.M. (2017). Why do they do it? A case study of factors influencing part-time faculty to seek employment at a community college. Community College Enterprise, 23(1), 43-59. Available at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/efl_fac_pubs/35.
- Pujol-Cols, L.J., & Lazzaro-Salazar, M. (2018). Psychosocial risks and job satisfaction in Argentinian scholars: Exploring the moderating role of work engagement. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a17.
- Raina, K., & Khatri, P. (2015). Faculty engagement in higher education: Prospects and areas of research. On the Horizon, 23(4), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-03-2015-0011.
- Reneau, M., Wallace, C., Claywell, L., Price, J., Burdi, M., & Trybulski, J. (2018). Factors influencing part-time faculty engagement with online nursing programs. Nurse Educator, 43(6), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000517.
- Robinson, O. (2014). Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543.
- Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed., p. 265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Available at: https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/11731919.
- Savage, J. (2017). Determining faculty climate and relationship between faculty and administration. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 29. Available at: http://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/workplace/article/view/186197/185454.
- Schieffer, L. (2016). The benefits and barriers of virtual collaboration among online adjuncts. Journal of Instructional Research, 5, 109-125. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v4n1a1.
- Shah, S.S., Shah, A.A., & Pathan, S.K. (2017). The relationship of perceived leadership styles of department heads to job satisfaction and job performance of faculty members. Journal of Business Strategies, 11(2), 35-56. https://www.researchgate.net.
- Stogdill, R.M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 35-71https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1948.9917362.
- Thirolf, K.Q. (2017). Reconceptualizing a more inclusive faculty engagement model: Including and engaging part-time faculty at community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(4-5), 303-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1251357.
- Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relationship leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007.
- Umadia, K., & Kasztelnik, K. (2020). The Financial Innovative Business Strategies of Small to Medium Scale Enterprises in Developing Country and Influence for the Global Economy Performance – SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(3), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.4(3).20-32.2020.
- Xiong, K., Lin, W., Li, J.C., & Wang, L. (2016). Employee trust in supervisors and affective commitment: The moderating role of authentic leadership. Psychological Reports, 118(3), 829-848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116644370.