Contents |
Authors:
Vladislav Novikov, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4979-2438 PhD researcher, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
Pages: 120-129
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.5(2).120-129.2021
Received: 02.05.2021
Accepted: 06.06.2021
Published: 25.06.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
Financial, economic and educational transformations might be clarified from very different perspectives. Economic transformations are used to identify as changes in value added contribution of some branch in its formation at national level, or its productivity. Nowadays economic transformation are by far wider and more complicated process because of intensification of globalization, integration and digitalization of economic relationship over the last few decades. Financial transformations are also caused by intensification of globalization, integration and digitalization of economic relationship and might be identified through characteristics of the scale of financialization in curtain country and all over the world. Expansion of financialization and digitalization trends led to relevant changes in financial products characteristics, ways of its distribution and promotion, and general relevance of financial sector in macroeconomic stability and sustainable economic growth. Digitalization and COVID-19 pandemic also led to considerable challenges and transformation of education system. Education process are needed to be based on modern pedagogical, technological and scientific approaches. It became crucial to not only disseminate traditional knowledge and ensure of obtaining hard skills, but also make students enriched with soft skills. Traditional learning process accompanied with physical visiting of classes and writing a thesis are no more relevant, so e-learning and distance learning technologies are an integral part of educational process nowadays. It is became obvious that economic, financial and education transformation are connected somehow and converged but there is lack of researches aimed at specification of their intercept and cohesion. Therefore, this research aimed at clarification of intercept between financial, economic and education transformations has both theoretical value and might have practical implication for policymakers. It is realized using VOSviewer tool based on publications in Scopus on financial, educational and economic transformations 1990–2020. Therefore, bibliometric analysis allow concluding that there are both common and specific clusters of scientific researches on economic, financial and educational transformations. Namely, all three types of transformations are somehow dependent on health care system, environmental determinants, social aspects, etc. It can be pointed out that these transformations have common preconditions, consequences and ways of implementation. This may leads to conclusion that there are some convergence between educational, financial and economic transformations.
Keywords: bibliometric analysis, digitalization, economic transformations, educational transformations, financial transformations.
JEL Classification: D83, L20, N70, O14, F52.
Cite as: Novikov, V. (2021). Intercept of Financial, Economic and Educational Transformations: Bibliometric Analysis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 5(2), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.5(2).120-129.2021
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715-753. [Link]
- Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in china.Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57-116. [Google Scholar]
- Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 170-180. [Link]
- Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (2012). The econometrics of financial markets. The econometrics of financial markets, 1-611. [Google Scholar]
- Didenko, I., Sidelnyk, N. (2021). Society’s Readiness for Modern Challenges of the Insurance Market: Bibliometric Analysis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 5(1), 116-125. [CrossRef]
- Eddassi, H. (2020). Fiscal Regime and Tax Policy in Resource-Rich Countries In The Process Of Globalization: Literature Review. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(2), 67-77. [CrossRef]
- Frederick, D. T., Kasztelnik, K. (2020). An Analytical Study of Impact of International Merger and Acquisitions on the Financial Performance for Higher Education Institution in the United States. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(4), 5-30. [CrossRef]
- Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study.Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. [CrossRef]
- Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning.American Psychologist, 58(6-7), 466-474. [Link]
- Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies.Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249-267. [Link]
- Kasztelnik, K., Brown, D. (2020). The Observational Socio-Economic Study and Impact on the International Innovative Leadership in the United States. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(4), 63-94. [CrossRef]
- Kaya, H.D. (2020). The Depth of the Financial System: A Comparison of Developed and Less Developed Countries. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(4), 109-118. [CrossRef]
- Lorant, V., Deliège, D., Eaton, W., Robert, A., Philippot, P., & Ansseau, M. (2003). Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: A meta-analysis.American Journal of Epidemiology, 157(2), 98-112. [Google Scholar]
- Matos, L., Kasztelnik, K. (2021). Transformational Educational Leadership and the Innovative Strategies Engaging Online Faculty for the Excellent Teaching Performance in the United States. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(1), 6-21. [CrossRef]
- McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques, and tools. Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques, and tools. [CrossRef]
- Molotok, I.F. (2020). Bibliometric and Trend Analysis of Budget Transparency. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(2), 116-122. [CrossRef]
- Berger, A., & F. Udell, G. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle.Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(6-8), 613-673. [Link]
- Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. Globalizing education policy, 1-228. [Link]
- Scopus (2020). [Link]
- Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The stern review. The economics of climate change: The stern review, 1-692. [Link]
- Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance.Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. [Link]
- Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of financial time series. Analysis of financial time series, 1-677. [Link]
- VOSviewer (2020). [Link]
- Western, B., Lopoo, L., & Pettit, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in america. Punishment and inequality in America, 1-247. [Link]
- Yelnikova, Y., Golochalova, I. (2020). Social Bonds as an Instrument of Responsible Investment. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(4), 119-128. [CrossRef]
|