, Teaching Staff Member at the Faculty of Governance and Global Affairs (FGGA) of Leiden University, Netherlands; Dual Ph.D. Candidate at the Graduate School of Leiden University, Netherlands; Course Coordinator for Sen Foundation for Research and Education on International Cooperation, Netherlands.
The research question that this article attempts to address is: what are the main policy paradigms that guide the opinion leaders throughout energy security matters within protracted conflict environments? Using the de facto divided island of Cyprus as our single case study, we will deliberately follow grounded theory in order to create conceptual definitions out of rudimentary “working ideas” that involve “protracted conflict environment”, “energy security” and stakes in “decision making”. This research enterprise involves open-ended interviews with the opinion-makers on the Island and “political discourse analysis” that identifies the quintessential aspects of the recently emerged energy debate. Drawing upon the work of Correlje and van der Linde (2006), we highlight two main paradigms: “markets and institutions” and “regions and empire”. In the first one, the business logic prevails upon political expediencies and geopolitical calculations, while in the second one, national and security concerns outweigh the business logic and the potential international economic integration. Through their interaction, we seek to explore how they drive the debate on energy security within the realm of a conflict environment.
Keywords: energy security, Cyprus conflict, policy paradigm, markets and institutions, regions and empire.
JEL Classification: D74, G18, Q4.
Cite as: Karakasis, V. P. (2017). The impact of “policy paradigms” on energy security issues in protracted conflict environments: the case of Cyprus. SocioEconomic Challenges, 1(2), 5-18. http://doi.org/10.21272/sec.1(2).5-18.2017.
- Anderson Peter (2008). The divisions of Cyprus. in London Review of Books, 30(8), 7-16.
- Athanasiou Thanos (11.7.2011). The tragedy in Mari [in Greek] in Sigmalive. Retrieved at http://www.sigmalive.com/timeliner/subjects/timeliner_mari/timeline-mari.html (accessed on 18.3.2017).
- Barnes Joe, Hayes Mark, Joffe Amy & Victor David (eds.) (2006). Natural Gas and Geopolitics. From 1970 to 1940, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Blay SKN (1981). Self-Determination in Cyprus: The New Dimensions of an Old Conflict. Australian Year Book of International Law, 67-100.
- Bleich Erik (2002). Integrating ideas into policy-making analysis: Frames and Race Policies in Britain and France”. Comparative Political Studies, 35(9), 1054-1076.
- Campbell J. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, 27(3), pp. 377-409.
- Charmaz Kathy (2011). Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis. in Holstein James & Gubrium Jaber (eds.) Inside Interviewing, Sage Research Methods, http://methods.sagepub.com/book/inside-interviewing.
- Correlje Aad & van der Linde Coby (2006). Energy supply security and geopolitics: A European perspective. Energy Policy, 34, 532-543.
- Gurel Ayrel, Mullen Fionna, Tzimitras Harry (2013). The Cyprus Hydrocarbons Issue: Context, Positions and Future Scenarios, in PRIO Cyprus Center Report 1/2013.
- Gurel Ayrel and Le Cornu Laura (2014). Can Gas Catalyze Peace in the Eastern Mediterranean. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 49(2), 11-33.
- Hall Peter (1990). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain, Working Paper Series. Retrieved at http://www.march.es/ceacs/publicaciones/
working/archivos/1990_4_en.pdf (accessed on 12.11.2011).
- Karakasis Vasileios (2013). The framing of the Euro crisis and the contribution of the German Policy Paradigm. International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies, 1(3), 224-249.
- Karakasis Vasileios (2015). Energy Security and the Cyprus Question: “Securitization” of Energy in the Eastern Mediterranean. Politikon: IAPSS Political Science Journal, 27(1), 5-35.
- Kuzemko Caroline (2014). Ideas, power and change: explaining EU energy relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 58-75.
- Morgenthau Hans (1948). Politics among Nations, New York: Knopf.
- Pouliot Vincent (2010). International Security in Practice. The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Saz Carranza Angel & Marie Vandendriessche (2015). Routes to Energy Security: The Geopolitics of Gas Pipelines, in Steven David & Emily O’Brien (eds.) The New Politics of Strategic Resources, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
- Seidel Gill (1985). Political Discourse Analysis, in Teun van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, London: Academic.
- Shaffer Brenda (2009). Energy Politics, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Sovacool Benjamin & Brown Marilyn (2010). Competing Dimensions of Energy Security: An International Perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 77-108.
- Spyridakis Constantinos (1974). A Brief History of Cyprus, Nicosia: Zavallis Press Limited.
- Stavrou Michael (2009). Resolving the Cyprus Conflict Negotiating History, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Yergin Daniel (3rd ed.) (2009). The Prize. The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power, New York: Free Press.
- Yergin Daniel (2012). The Quest. Energy, Security and the Remaking of the New World, New York: The Penguin Press.
- Weir Margaret and Skocpol Theda (1985). State Structures and the Possibilities for “Keynesian” Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States, in Evans Peter (ed.). Bringing the state back in, Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-164.
- Winrow Gareth (2016). The Anatomy of a Possible Pipeline: The Case of Turkey and Leviathan and Gas Politics in the Eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 18(5), 431-447.